|
Internal
documents:Capitol ill-prepared for bomb attack
|
By Jordy Yager
|
|
Posted: 06/23/08 07:46 PM [ET] |
A
future terrorist attack on the U.S. Capitol is highly
probable, and Congress’s specialized bomb squad is
unlikely to be able to deal with it, according to
internal U.S. Capitol Police documents obtained by The
Hill.
The
unclassified internal letters and memos, written by
Capitol Police captains, lieutenants, and sergeants
between 2005 and 2007, detail more than three years of
complaints to their superiors about the Hazardous
Devices Unit’s lack of vehicles, its desire for more
frequent training and the inadequate level of experience
of bomb technicians within the specialty unit.
A
suicide bombing or a car bomb are “the two major threats
to the United States Capitol complex and the
Congressional community,” according to a memo from
mid-2006. While Washington, D.C., has not experienced
the effects of such attacks, “the possibility that one
of these two techniques may be used remains quite high
and could become a reality.”
The
2006 document cited “intelligencce reports.”
Capitol Hill’s bomb squad, tasked with protecting
lawmakers, their staffs and visiting dignitaries, is
considered one of the premier hazardous device units in
the country, and it responds to severalhundred possible
threats each year.
But
morale in the unit has fallen because of several key
issues raised in the internal letters, according to
Capitol Police sources. They said the issues remain
unresolved and could hamper the bomb squad’s ability to
respond to an attack.
Nearly half of the unit’s 14 members are seeking jobs
elsewhere, according to Capitol Police sources.
Members could find opportunities at the Pentagon, which
is forming a bomb squad, sources said.
Capitol Police is "fully prepared to carry out our daily
mission to protect the legislative process, in addition
to responding to critical incidents on a daily basis,"
said Sgt. Kimberly Schneider, Capitol Police
spokeswoman. "We remain at a constant state of
readiness."
At
the top of the elite unit’s concerns is its need for
additional vehicles, particularly for off-duty members
of the bomb squad who might be needed in the aftermath
of an attack. For example, in the event of a coordinated
simultaneous attack, a strategy that terrorist groups
have used in recent years, bomb squad members returning
to Capitol Hill could get stuck in traffic.
Off-duty bomb squad members must report to Capitol Hill
in their own personal vehicles, which have no sirens and
are impossible for other drivers to distinguish,
according to the letters. Once on Capitol Hill, the
returning squad members would have to park their own
cars and then drive a departmental vehicle to the scene
of the threat.
“To
carry out its mission to protect the Congress, staff and
public on the Capitol Campus and to remain in the
forefront of bomb disposal technology, the Hazardous
Devices Section [HDS] must have the vehicles that are
appropriate and necessary to deploy its equipment,” said
one document written in late 2006.
The
memos say the unit’s fleet of vehicles cannot meet the
needs of its new equipment, a problem Capitol Police
sources said remains unresolved. The documents call for
Capitol Police to buy more large vehicles to keep up
with updated bomb squad equipment.
Schneider disagreed with that conclusion. She said the
unit is adequately supplied, but would not cite
specifics for security reasons. “They have vehicles
that meet their needs,” Schneider said of the bomb
squad.
The
documents show bomb squad officials have also repeatedly
requested more frequent training to stay abreast of the
ever-evolving tactics used by terrorists.
“Specialized training and proficiency are of the utmost
concern as HDS strives to perform its assigned mission
under the department’s Strategic Plan,” said one
document from last year, which cited eight training
programs that had been postponed or canceled because
there was no money to pay for them.
Capitol Police bomb technicians are required to complete
a refresher course at the Hazardous Devices School in
Redstone, Ala., every three years. But Capitol Police
sources say this is not enough to keep up with
techniques and devices employed by attackers.
The
average Capitol Police bomb technician has three or four
years of experience, with the most senior technician
serving for more than 12 years, according to Capitol
Police sources.
Schneider said bomb squad members receive adequate
training, and that the squad includes members with
extensive experience. The squad also includes younger
members, who are mentored by senior members they are
expected to succeed.
“The combination and the mix of experience levels is
critical to a good unit, and we do have that,” she said.
The
documents, however, make repeated requests to increase
the unit’s numbers and experience.
Another problem in the squad highlighted by Capitol
Police sources is that the department does not promote
bomb squad administrators from within the unit. Bomb
squad administrators organize the unit’s response to
threats, but rarely have bomb-related experience.
The
reason for this policy is that the department wants to
have individuals who are good at organizing and
administrative duties in those positions, while those
most familiar with bomb threats are on hand to deal with
actual bombs.
Current and former police officials, however, defended
this policy.
“When I was chief, the captain of the bomb unit was an
outstanding technician and a very good captain, but that
was relatively unique,” said Terrance Gainer, former
Capitol Police chief and current Senate sergeant at
arms. “In my experience, I think finding both
combinations is rare. So what you try to do is have
great technicians, sergeants who have stronger technical
skills than they are managers, and then lieutenants and
captains who have great leadership skills who aren’t
making technical decisions.”
Schneider further explained the department’s policy.
“It’s an administrative choice,” she said. “The
assignment of personnel overall and assignment of
supervisory personnel is standardized across the
department and it’s based on the needs of the
department. If it’s going to support the mission, then
the department’s going to move in that direction, move
people and assign them appropriately.” |